Organic Consumers Association

Tell the EPA You Want Lower, Not Higher, Limits on Monsanto's Roundup!

When does one plus one not equal two? When mounting evidence says glyphosate, the key ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup pesticide, does more damage to our health and environment than we thought.  And the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) responds by approving higher, not lower, allowable limits of the pesticide residue.

Please sign the letter below. Tell the EPA you want lower, not higher, limits on Monsanto’s glyphosate and Roundup!

In May,  the EPA announced a final ruling to increase, yet again, the allowed residue limits in food and animal feed of glyphosate, the key active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide. Under the ruling, the allowed glyphosate level in animal feed will rise to 100 parts per million (ppm) and 40 ppm in oilseed crops.

There is precedence for final rulings to be revisited, even reversed, if enough people voice their opposition. The EPA will take comments on the ruling until the end of today, July 1, 2013.

The EPA ruling defies sound science and undermines public health. Peer reviewed studies show rats fed diets as low as 2ppm of glyphosate were 70 percent to 80 percent more likely to develop tumors. Infertility, affecting both the sperm and the egg, was documented in animals subjected to glyphosate residue levels as low as .05 ppm. Birth defects in frog and chicken embryos resulted after being subjected to glyphosate residues of just 2.03 ppm.

Yet the EPA claims glyphosate is only “minimally toxic” to humans, and 40 ppm is nothing to worry about?

The EPA’s decision is all the more unjustifiable in light of two recently published, peer reviewed studies revealing glyphosate to be a far greater threat to human health than previously determined.

 According to a
study published in the journal Entropy in April 2013, glyphosate is related to debilitating diseases like gastrointestinal disorders, diabetes, heart disease, obesity, autism, Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s. The study says the negative impact on the human body is “insidious and manifests slowly over time, as inflammation damages cellular systems throughout the body… it may in fact be the most biologically disruptive chemical in our environment.”

2012 study published in the journal Archives of Toxicology showed Roundup is toxic to human DNA even when diluted to concentrations 450-fold lower than used in agricultural applications. Industry regulators and long-term studies look at glyphosate in isolation, instead of looking at Roundup’s full formulation, which includes secret added ingredients. These “confidential” and unlabeled ingredients, when measured as a whole, affect all living cells, including human cells.

Glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide in the world.  According to the EPA, at least 208 million tons of Roundup were sprayed on GE crops, lawns and roadsides in the years 2006 and 2007. In 2007, as much as 185 million pounds of glyphosate was used by U.S. farmers, double the
amount used just six years ago.

2009 study found that Americans use about 100 million pounds of glyphosate annually on their lawns and gardens. It’s safe to assume all these number are much higher now. Why? Because GE crops are now being invaded by new strains of herbicide-resistant “superweeds” requiring higher and higher doses of poison.

Beyond Pesticides has assembled extensive documentation of past
research linking glyphosate to increased cancer risk, neurotoxicity and birth defects, as well as eye, skin, respiratory irritation, lung congestion, increased breathing rate, damage to the pancreas, kidney and testes.

Glyphosate also endangers the environment, destroys soil and plants, and is linked to a host of health hazards. The EPA’s decision to increase the allowed residue limits of glyphosate is out of date, dangerous to the health of people and the environment and scientifically unsupportable.

Please sign the letter below. Tell the EPA you want lower, not higher, limits on Monsanto’s glyphosate and Roundup!

1-25 of 88987 signatures
Number Date Name Location
88987 1 day ago Brock Seaton Encino, CA
88986 1 day ago Marelyn Thomas Richmond, CA
88985 3 days ago Angela Svonavec PA
88984 5 days ago Tiffany Mandara Tucson, AZ
88983 1 week ago Lenore Morrell Santa Monica, CA
88982 2 weeks ago Fred Stephens Longwood, FL
88981 3 weeks ago Jill Adler Oklahoma City, OK As a physician, I know that what affects plants and insects also affects humans. We need to learn to live herbicide and insecticide free, to protect our children and future generations.
88980 3 weeks ago Sharon High Santa Clara, CA
88979 3 weeks ago Melissa Sklar Ann Arbor, MI
88978 3 weeks ago KATE JENSEN FLAGSTAFF, AZ
88977 3 weeks ago Donna Hudson Cookeville TN, TN I have celiac disease. It took me several years to figure out that GMO fed meat would inflame my gut, but that organic meat would not. Now I have read about the Senoff study verifying my conclusio...
88976 3 weeks ago Betty Byrne Los Altos, CA
88975 3 weeks ago Laura Ludwig Lincoln Park, MI i want no spraying of poisons on our food crops, get it?
also do not want any gmo's on my store shelves, get it?
88974 3 weeks ago Mark Fragola FL
88973 3 weeks ago Bruce Eggum Gresham, WI, WI
88972 3 weeks ago Melissa Mulvihill Hudson, OH
88971 3 weeks ago Anonymous Charlotte, NC
88970 3 weeks ago Dimitris Dallis Patra, ot
88969 3 weeks ago Lindsey Hall NY
88968 4 weeks ago K Schryburt ON
88967 4 weeks ago doreen beattie Middletown, RI
88966 4 weeks ago Daniel Youness Haines City, FL
88965 4 weeks ago Kristy Franklin
88964 4 weeks ago mike gautherat fairfield, IA
88963 4 weeks ago Anonymous ME
Next ->