Organic Consumers Association

NEW DEADLINE JANUARY 30: Tell the USDA You Don’t Want a GMO Apple!

No GMO Apples!The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is poised to approve the first genetically engineered apple. The "Arctic Apple®” is engineered for the purely cosmetic purpose of preventing browning after it’s been sliced. Scientists say the technology used to create this new frankenapple is untested and inherently risky.

Unless the USDA heeds consumers, environmentalists and apple growers who are speaking out against deregulation of the Arctic Apple, the first GMO apple could soon turn up in fast-food restaurants, school cafeterias—even baby food. With no labels to warn consumers.

The Arctic Apple poses a risk to human health, a risk to the environment and a risk to conventional and non-organic apple growers.

Please sign the petition below: Tell the USDA to reject biotech’s non-browning Frankenapple! 



1-25 of 119190 signatures
Number Date Name Location
119190 2 weeks ago Pamela White Guerneville, CA
119189 3 weeks ago Anonymous Berkeley, CA Do not approve any more GMO foods. People and our environment should not be used as guinea pigs for GMOs. Stop all GMO testing in nature.
119188 3 weeks ago Melinda Namanny Mapleton, IA Please do not contaminate another food source. If you read the truthful science on GMOs you will not want this.
119187 3 weeks ago Monica Dhaliwal Kent, WA Haven't you done enogh harm already on the US population by constantly approving GMOs into food products...?
Would you like to digest the GMOs you've been approving...for I'd love to come and cu...
119186 1 month ago Barbara Sullivan IL
119185 1 month ago G Bommelaere Colorado Springs, CO
119184 1 month ago K. Arnone Broklyn, NY
119183 1 month ago K. Arnone Broklyn, NY
119182 1 month ago K. Arnone Broklyn, NY
119181 1 month ago Christopher Visco NY
119180 1 month ago K. Arnone Broklyn, NY
119179 1 month ago K. Arnone Broklyn, NY
119178 1 month ago K. Arnone Broklyn, NY
119177 1 month ago Julia Flansburg moore, OK
119176 1 month ago Kristi Heironimus Sherwood, OR
119175 2 months ago Joseph Llona WA
119174 2 months ago Jackie Richey Arroyo Grande, CA
119173 2 months ago K. Arnone Broklyn, NY
119172 2 months ago Karen Mayer Granada Hills, CA This is ridiculous and pootentially dangerous.
119171 2 months ago angela allen-barr los angeles, CA
119170 2 months ago K. Arnone Broklyn, NY
119169 2 months ago bradley cromer elkins, WV i will stick with the apples on my tree, in my yard... do not want to eat or drink anymore chemicals and pesticides .in my food ... i like brown apples
119168 3 months ago Lawrence Merlino Saugerties, NY
119167 3 months ago Brian Pike Cypress, TX
119166 3 months ago Brian Pike Cypress, TX
Next ->

Background:

Most existing genetically engineered plants are designed to make new proteins. But the Arctic Apple is engineered to produce a form of genetic information called double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). The new dsRNA alters the way genes are expressed. The result, in the Arctic Apple’s case, is a new double strand of RNA that genetically “silences” the apple’s ability to produce polyphenol oxidase, an enzyme that causes the apple to turn brown when it’s exposed to oxygen.

Harmless? Not according to many scientists, including Professor Jack Heinemann (University of Canterbury, New Zealand), Sarah Agapito-Tenfen (from Santa Catarina University in Brazil) and Judy Carman (Flinders University in South Australia). They say that dsRNA manipulation is untested, and therefore inherently risky. According to these and other scientists, given that the dsRNA from our food, and presumably the Frankenapple, will enter the bloodstream and cells of consumers, safety research should be done before this GMO apple is put on the grocery shelf in order to prove that the dsRNA that enters consumers' bodies will not harm them. To date, no such research has been reported.

Frankenapple also poses a contamination risk. The U.S. Apple Association (which represents most commercial apple growers), the Northwest Horticultural Council (which represents Washington apple growers who grow over 60 percent of the apples in the U.S. and more than 80 percent of the U.S.-certified organic apples), and the British Columbia Fruit Growers Association oppose deregulation of the Arctic Apple citing fears of crop contamination. If buyers suspect conventional and organic apple crops have been contaminated, growers say the market will reject them resulting in lost export revenue.

And then there’s the pesticide problem. Non-organic apples already top the Environmental Working Group’s Dirty Dozen list, for both the volume and the stunning array of pesticides consistently found on them. 

But the frankenapple poses an additional risk. Here’s why. The chemical compound that is shut off in the GMO apple, in order to prevent browning, also fights off plant pests. What happens when the apple’s ability to fend off insects is compromised? Growers will likely need to spray greater amounts of possibly even more toxic pesticides. 

According to the Pesticide Action Network’s analysis of the most recent USDA data, apples tested positive for 42 pesticides, including organophosphate and pyrethroid pesticides. Both are endocrine disruptors, both have suspected neurological effects, and both are considered especially toxic for children.