Tell the FDA: NO Frankenfish!


The first genetically engineered salmon - dubbed "frankenfish" - could be in grocery stores and restaurants as early as 2014. The FDA is expected to approve AquaBounty Technologies' GE salmon after a 60-day public comment period. If approved, it will be the first approved food from a transgenic animal application to enter the U.S. food supply.

Consumer and environmental activists oppose genetically engineered "frankenfish" for many reasons, including the potential danger it poses to human health, to the environment and to the U.S. fishing economy. Michael Hansen, PhD, senior scientist with the Consumers Union, the advocacy and policy arm of Consumer Reports, called the FDA's Environmental Assessment (EA) of GE salmon "flawed and inadequate."

Please sign the petition below if you agree that the FDA should reject AquaBounty's genetically engineered salmon, at least until it completes further, more reliable safety testing.

What is frankenfish?

AquaBounty Technologies, a Massachusetts-based biotech company, created the "AquAdvantage" salmon by injecting a fragment of DNA from an ocean pout fish, which is a type of eel, along with a growth hormone gene from the Chinook Pacific salmon, into a fertilised Atlantic salmon egg. The result? A salmon that produces growth hormone year round, instead of only during warm weather. This allows the fish to reach market weight in just 18 months, instead of the usual three years.

What are the risks?

  1. Potential harm to human health. The FDA has allowed this fish to move forward based on tests of allergenicity of only six GE fish. Even with such limited testing, the results showed an increase in allergy-causing potential, according to Hansen. AquAdvantage also contains elevated levels of the growth hormone, IGF-1, which is linked to prostate, breast and colon cancers.
  2. Potential harm to wild salmon population. Only 95% of the AquAdvantage salmon may be sterile, the rest fertile. Plus, the fish at the egg production facility in Prince Edward Island, Canada, will not be sterile. The FDA says the likelihood of the GE salmon escaping into the wild is "extremely remote" but gave little reassuring evidence to support that assumption. According to studies, the frankenfish eat five times more food than wild salmon, and have less fear of predators. All it would take is for some of these frankenfish to escape, and the world's wild salmon population would be at risk.
  3. Unlabeled. Without GMO labeling, consumers will not be able to avoid frankenfish when it arrives in grocery stores and fish markets.
  4. Less nutritious. GE salmon contains less Omega-3 fatty acids than non-GE salmon. Omega-3 fatty acids are the "good" fat which has important health benefits.

 Additional Background

The FDA's 158-page Environmental Assessment was completed May 14, but was blocked from release by the White House, which waited until December 21 - well after the election.

The Environmental Assessment states that genetically engineered salmon will be adapted "to feeding on synthetic aquaculture diets." The FDA didn't explain what it meant by "synthetic aquaculture" or make any investigation into what the genetically engineered salmon would eat. Conventional farmed salmon can be fed byproducts from poultry processing, such as feathers, necks and intestines, and genetically modified soy and canola.

The FDA said that AquAdvantage does not pose a threat to the environment and is "as safe as food from conventional Atlantic salmon." But in its 5-page summary, the agency admits that it intentionally narrowed the scope of its analysis.

Since September 2010 there has been unprecedented pushback on plans to grow an engineered variant of farmed Atlantic salmon. Over 400,000 public comments in opposition have been sent to the FDA. Forty members of Congress called for a full Environmental Impact Statement before approval was granted.

Opponents argue that approval of frankenfish will pave the way for other genetically engineered animals for human consumption, which could raise serious questions about animal welfare.

The Ocean Conservancy opposes AquAdvantage salmon.

Intrexon Corporation owns a 48-percent stake in AquaBounty, the inventor of frankenfish. Intrexon is a biotechnology company focused on the industrial engineering of synthetic biology. Intrexon designs and produces novel and enhanced biological products and processes for protein production, agricultural biotechnology and animal science. The company boasts "unprecedented control over the function and output of living cells."

Sources

FDA Misses the Boat in Signaling Approval of Genetically-Engineered Salmon by George Leonard, December 22, 2012

Ready to Eat: The First GM Fish for the Dinner Table, by Steve Connor

FDA Quietly Pushes Through Genetically Modified Salmon over Christmas Break by Anthony Gucciardi

The Apocalypse is Here: FDA Clears Way for Fast-Growing GE Monster Salmon, by Susie Cagle

CU Says FDA Assessment of GE Salmon Is Flawed and Inadequate, by Michael McCauley

Intrexon to acquire 48% stake in AquaBounty

We need to keep fighting the pro-biotech, pro-Monsanto politics of the Obama Administration. Help us send as many public comments to the FDA as possible to try to stop genetically engineered salmon. Direct action is going to be necessary, too. If the Obama Administration stubbornly continues to hide behind the scientifically discredited Bush-Quayle doctrine of "substantial equivalence" claiming there isn't a "material" difference between genetically engineered and normal salmon, then we'll have no choice but to use every tactic we can muster to throw a wrench into the gears of the Frankenfoods Express.

Please sign the petition below today.  And, please forward this action alert to everyone you know. Thank you!



This petition has a goal of 100000 signatures
1-25 of 130809 signatures
Number Date Name Location
130809 3 days ago Anonymous Cape coral, FL I can't even begin to say how disgusting and dangerous this Is. This has to be shut down before this monster gets out into the REAL eco system and makes another problem for the oceans.. There are no...
130808 4 days ago Sonja Koontz Pana, IL
130807 4 days ago Ann Careau AZ
130806 4 days ago kim brooks simi valley, CA
130805 4 days ago Martin Lavender MD
130804 4 days ago Susan Churella OH
130803 5 days ago Jean Espinosa Live Oak,Florida, FL
130802 5 days ago Anila Roberts Cotati, CA
130801 5 days ago Autumn Moran Denver, CO
130800 5 days ago Hector Dominguez NY
130799 5 days ago akiba timoya Oakland, CA
130798 5 days ago Paul Offen NC
130797 5 days ago Anonymous Palisades, NY
130796 5 days ago Maribeth Milner NE
130795 5 days ago Lawrence Barrett Glen Mills PA, PA
130794 5 days ago Jane Copher Indianapolis, IN I refuse to buy or eat genetically altered food products,. I don't want meat or fish that is a GMO!!!!
130793 5 days ago Daniel DeShane Coal Valley, IL Remember the Island of Dr. Moreau ? Man will only compromise Mother natures Grand design !
130792 5 days ago Alice Thomas CA
130791 5 days ago Anonymous Madison, WI GMO is dangerous for human and wildlife health and needs to be stopped. Only harm can come from GMOs.
130790 5 days ago Richard Siegel fort lauderdale, FL
130789 5 days ago Richard Siegel fort lauderdale, FL
130788 5 days ago Martha Figueroa-Ahmed Forty Fort, PA
130787 6 days ago Sharon Westover FL This is personal, please pay attention!
130786 6 days ago Anonymous PA
130785 1 week ago Naomi shoemake CA
Next ->